Order 41, Rule 27 read with Section 151 CPC
_*• Order 41, Rule 27 read with Section 151 CPC Production of additional evidence Neither appellants predecessor nor appellants had any subsisting prima facie title in their favour over suit land on the date of filing suits-Appellants failed to file any document in rebuttal to documents filed by respondent in appeal by way of additional evidence-Such fact alone would have enabled appellants to claim and assert their right of ownership over suit land-Respondent did give explanation for filing additional evidence Judgment passed by High Court upheld. (Paras 23 )*_ Legallites Law Firm _*YP Subhanva v/s Karnataka Milk CA 4412/18 25/04/18 [ RK AGRAWAL JJ ]*_ _*[ SUPREME COURT ]*_ Legallites law firm 8851250058