Kidnapping Demand of ransom

_*• Sections 364A, 34 and 395 IPC - Evidence Act, Section 63(b) - Kidnapping Demand of ransom Out of three persons abducted driver released very next day whereas other two kept in captivity for 52 days Different treatment accorded to all abductee - Letter written and signed by abductee asking to pay ransom and secure their release Demand for ransom also stand established from conversations between informant and and kidnapper on mobile - Demand of ransom established - Ransom actually paid or not, not relevant. [Paras 30 and 31]*_


_*Birbal Choudhary v/s State of Bihar CRL-A 701/12 06/10/17 [ AK SIKRI JJ ]*_

_*[ SUPREME COURT ]*_

*_______________________
Legallites Law Firm
8851250058  

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Section 374(2) read with Section 383 CRPC POCSO ACT Sections 5(m) and 6

Image
_*• Section 374(2) read with Section 383 CRPC  POCSO ACT Sections 5(m) and 6  Sexual assault with minor Testimonies of victim and mother Material improvements in statements of child victim and her mother Testimony of child victim that she was told by her mother about what to say in Court MLC records that child victim's hymen found partially torn but neither any injury nor any blood was noticed either in vagina or on her clothes Child victim not changed her clothes and no opinion given as to whether partial hymen tear was fresh or old Moreover, FSL report shows that no blood was detected on her clothes - Therefore, order of conviction and sentence set aside. [Paras 21 and 22]*_ _*Altaf vs State CRL-A 474/20 03/12/20 [ MANOJ KUMAR JJ ]*_ Advocate & solicitor _*[ DELHI HIGH COURT ]*_ Advocate and solicitor  8851250058
Read more

Delhi High Court Criminal Case Judgments

_*🎓🎓THE DELHI HIGH COURT*_       _* CRIMINAL CASE*_ _*01 =   Section 374(2)  CRPC   Sec. 302 IPC  Murder Conviction & sentence  Challenged  Hostile witness Conduct  Witness PW15 was put to cross-examination, but accused did not cross-examine witness despite opportunity being granted PW12 corroborated testimony of PW15 Testimony of PW32 also establishes presence of PW15 at spot immediately after incident PW15 presence at house of deceased was natural, he being domestic servant of deceased Statement of witness PW-24,  Jaswinder Singh @ Jassa v/s State CRL.A. 1402/2014 03/07/18*_ _*02 =  Protection of Women From Domestic Violence Act, Section 12 Interim maintenance-Mere fact that spouse with whom the child is living is having a source of income, even if sufficient, would in no way absolve other spouse of his obligation to make his contribution towards maintenance and welfare of child, even if, means/income/salary o...
Read more

permission to file fresh suit on the same subject matter

_*• 0RDER .23.RULE.1(3) CPC permission to file fresh suit on the same subject matter -Defendant can object to such prayer made by plaintiff-In such event, it is for Court to decide as to whether permission to seek withdrawal of suit should be granted to plaintiff and if so on what terms. (Para 26)*_ _*Anil Kumar v/s Vijay Pal CA 2007/17 30/11/17 [ RK AGRAWAL JJ ]*_ _*[ SUPREME COURT ]*_ *_______________________
Read more