Order 9 Rule 13 and Order 5 r/w Section 115 CPC

_*:- Order 9 Rule 13 and Order 5 r/w Section 115 CPC  

Setting aside ex-parte decree Plea of non-service of summons  Same found not supported by materials on the record Resultantly, impugned order declining prayer for setting aside ex-parte decree, held to be justified and declined to be interfered with in revision. [Paras 5 and 6]*_
advocate-in-Rohini-court-delhi
Legallites Law Firm


_*The Death Of Krishna Biswas, His Legal Heirs v/s  Keshab Chandra Dey CWP 530/12 [ Prasanta JJ ]*_

_*[ GAUHATI HIGH COURT ]*_
*______________________
Legallites Law Firm
8851250058 


Location: Shershah Road, Justice SB Marg, Delhi High Court, India Gate, New Delhi, Delhi 110503, India

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (25 of 1955) Section 13(1)(ia) – Maintenance – Undoubtedly

Image
the h usband is earning well while being posted in Singapore, however, the cost of living in Singapore is higher – The husband is already paying a rent @ 3200 Singapore Dollars, per month and income tax @ 1583 Singapore Dollars – Thus, the net income of the respondent gets substantially reduced – Keeping in view the status of the parties and their income, it is considered appropriate to direct the respondent to pay a sum of Rs.50,000/-, per month, to the wife towards interim  maintenanc e allowance from the date  of the h usband is earning well while being posted in Singapore, however, the cost of living in Singapore is higher – The husband is already paying a rent @ 3200 Singapore Dollars, per month and income tax @ 1583 Singapore Dollars – Thus, the net income of the respondent gets substantially reduced – Keeping in view the status of the parties and their income, it is considered appropriate to direct the respondent to pay a sum of Rs.50,000/-, per month, to the wife ...
Read more

Appeal against conviction

Image
- Sections 363, 366 and 376(1) IPC  Appeal against conviction  Accused allegedly kidnapped and committed rape upon victim who is below age of 18 years Age of victim proved to be above 16 years but below 18 years Medical evidence neither detecting spermatozoa nor mentioning any external injury on private parts of victim  No external injury on any part of the body or vagina region is found  Victim herself admitted that she wanted to marry accused but only with consent of her parents Prosecution has not established that rape is committed against the victim's will and without her consent Offence under Section 376 IPC is not made out Conviction under section 363 and 376 set aside but modified under section 366 Appeal partly allowed. [Paras 14, 16, 17 and 26]*_ legallites law firm _*Darji Chirag Urmilbhai v/s  State of Gujarat CRL-A 2151/05 [ V.P. Patel JJ ]*_ _*[ GUJARAT HIGH COURT ]*_ *____________________ Legallites law firm 8851250058
Read more