service law

_*• Service law

 Order directing reinstatement of the workman with back wages challenged Misconduct Alleged that Respondent had issued 35 tickets for an amount of Rs. 36.50 each but had not punched the tickets Order clearly shows that it was not proved that workman had taken extra monies from passenger Therefore contention that workman was engaged in financial malpractice is untenable - Logical corollary would be to reinstate workman with reduction of 50% back wages because of negligence impugned order does not call for any interference - Amount deposited by petitioner to released to respondent along with accrued interest [Paras 3 to 6]*_


_*Delhi Transport Co vs SP Sagar WPC 374/10 19/02/20*_

_*[ DELHI HIGH COURT ]*_   

Legallites law firm 

8851250058

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (25 of 1955) Section 13(1)(ia) – Maintenance – Undoubtedly

क्या पति पर धारा 377 आईपीसी के तहत मुकदमा चलाया जा सकता है, जब धारा 375 आईपीसी वैवाहिक यौन संबंध से छूट देती है? दिल्ली हाईकोर्ट विचार करेगा

Section 374(2) read with Section 383 CRPC POCSO ACT Sections 5(m) and 6